Cymbeline @LCT

I saw a preview for Cymbeline this weekend.  Broadway is still on strike (I'm out of a job) but thank God Lincoln Center is open for business.  At least I can see some theater on my new found "snow days" off from work (although the novelty wore off after the first day).  Cymbeline.  Who knew Shakespeare wrote such happy endings?  I suppose Shakespeare-ites knew, but I sure didn't.  What a fun little serio-dramatic play.  Lots of drama filled with lots of laughs.  Just when things would get a little too serious and you wonder if you just stepped into a darker play, the old man steps out and hits you with a one liner and things relax again.  I thought the performances were very good.  I had a seat on one of the far sides of the theater in the last row so I wonder if that played any part in my difficulty hearing sometimes, although some actors could project better than others.  I'm so glad I finally got to see Martha Plimpton live on stage.  She really is a force of nature.  Not just her vocal energy carried the back of the theater, but her emotional energy as well.  Every word she spoke made sense as if it were actual everyday dialogue coming from a Mamet play.  Also quite incredible is Jonathan Cake.  Remember that name.  He will be moving onwards and upwards soon.  He has the acting chops, good looks, and physique(not to mention the accent) to make it big.  I've seen Michael Cerveris in many other productions (Sweeney Todd, King Lear, LoveMusik) and this might be my least favorite.  He is a fine actor and has a clear understanding of the work.  I think he is a bit miscast as the leading man lover opposite Plimpton.  Others in the cast perform as expected.  John Collum played John Collum to the tee.  As did Phylicia Rashad.  They both are commanding on stage, if a little cliche as King who doesn't realize the machinations going on around him, and Queen who (like Fastrada in Pippin) tries to get her loaf of a son the throne by ousting the King.  The rest of the cast is wonderful.  Relationships were very clear and specific among everyone.  I think the overall MVP goes to the director Mark Lamos.  I thought everything was clear and concise.  Transition moved along swiftly from scene to scene and the entire production served the overall message in the end.  I love walking out of the theater feeling newly inspired.  

Frankenstein (the off-broadway one)

Oh wow.  I tried people, I really tried.  I wanted to like it.  I listened to the demo...twice.  I tried to go with an open mind, no preconceived judgements of any kind.  Well, maybe a couple.  Did you watch the video clip on Broadway.com?  Regardless, watch it I did.  It was hard.  I know those actors are trying so hard to make the material work.  I wish I could say the same of the director.  The entire piece lacked storytelling, clear transitions, and clear relationships.  There were great technical aspects like crazy cool projections and tons of fancy lighting.  And yet, I thought these weren't utilized enough.  The music had some nice moments, but I just wish the orchestrations were a little more rich, and a little less tinny.  Hunter Foster tried his hardest to make the whole character work, he is on stage virtually the entire time.  I can't help thinking that he was slightly miscast and should be in the other Frankenstein musical playing on Broadway this season (although how awkward would that be playing opposite his sister...).  Blanchard tried to bring a very human, realistic nature to the beast but really just looks like a very 'special' kind of monster instead.  The real bright spot of the piece however is Christiane Noll.  Every time she opened her mouth I was transformed to another show and forgot that I was bored a minute earlier.  She was worth the price of admission (as long as you got tkts price, or tdf.com price).  I'd say stay away from this one.  When will people learn that scary monster/vampire shows just don't work.

I Had A Ball

And I did have a ball.  This is a fun little show.  It is pop and jazzy and fun, very much predicting the direction of show tunes heading into the mid sixties.  It was a flop show, opening in the end of 1964 starring Buddy "I don't sing on pitch" Hackett, Karen "I'll belt my guts out" Morrow, and Richard "there's nothing I don't sound incredible singing" Kiley.  It lasted 199 performances and would have lasted longer if Hacket didn't leave the show, have a fist fight with producer Joseph Kipness, get knocked out cold, and refuse to let anyone take over his part (they wanted Phil Silvers).  The musical ended, but we have the album.   I like the tunes alot.  They are toe tapping, rhythmic, and melodic most of the time.  Of course Richard Kiley makes everything sound amazing, especially "The Other Half of Me" and "Fickle Finger of Fate".  For all the fuss Hacket made during the show, he hardly sings on the album which is not exactly a bad thing.  All his songs are forgettable, but you do get a sense of the crazy comedian he was.  Karen Morrow sings on a couple of the bonus tracks, and she's great.  The whole album is very slick, with great liner notes, and a prefect sound.  Quincy Jones was even the original producer of the album.  Go figure.  

Hot September

Hot September premiered in Boston in September of 1965 but closed less than a month later canceling the New York opening planned for that October.  It was based on William Inge's play "Picnic".  The music, written by Kenneth "what else did he write" Jacobson is actually quite interesting at times.  The lyrics by Rhoda Roberts are not bad at all, I don't think I cringed even once.  Frank Sinatra even recorded one song, Golden Moment, for the charts.  In addition to that ditty, there are plenty of other wonderful tunes worth listening to more than once.  I especially liked "What Do You Do", "I Got It Made", and "Tell Her".  The orchestrations are pretty much nonexistent.  All you really hear is piano and drums.  Bonus tracks on the CD have great arrangements that make you wish the entire scored were recorded in that way.  This recording is a great representative of the transition in musical theater sound of the late 50's/early 60's to the more pop style of the late 60's/early 70's.   Check it out.

A Little Night Music..... THE MOVIE!???

I'm sick today and had to call out of work.  What better way to spend the day than by watching musicals on the TV????  I have a bunch of DVDs and VHSs that I've bought and borrowed that are begging to be watched, including A Little Night Music.  Starring Elizabeth Taylor.  Oh wow.  What an interesting movie.  This is unlike any other Sondheim show made to be watched outside of the theater.  Unlike Sunday in the Park, Sweeney(the original), Into The Woods, or Passion, this rendition of A Little Night Music was made specifically as a movie-musical.  I've heard alot of people talk about how awful this movie is, particularly Elizabeth Taylor, and much of the singing as well.  Truth be told, I didn't mind it too much.  I thought on the whole all the filming was as simple as it gets.  Look up Harold Prince on imdb.com.  This is one of the only movies he's ever made.  I actually liked the simplicity of it all though.  I feel like movies today are made with shots cutting left and right every 4 seconds.  I like being able to watch the action on the screen as it is unfolding while taking place all in one shot.   The performers were not bad.  I thought Diana Rigg as was very funny and right for Charlotte.  Elizabeth Taylor was not terrible, but not enjoyable.  She seemed uncomfortable when she started singing.  It happened a couple times during the movie with others as well.  The actor would be doing just fine, and the song would start and it was like they didn't know what to do with their hands.  Things got a little fishy.  Hermione Gingold, Len Cariou, and Lawrence Guittard were all superior to the rest.  But no wonder, they were all in the original cast on Broadway.  While a couple songs were cut from the stage version (like Miller's Son) it stayed pretty true to the original plot line.

Check out this movie and appreciate the fact that they didn't try convert Sondheim's other shows to this kind craziness.  

Listen to the new words: www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8PV33dmVVU

Welcome!

After spending entirely too much time reading other people's blogs, I've decided to dive into this world.  I'm not a great writer, often can't spell, and I have a hard time getting my thoughts down in words so starting a blog was never at the top of the 'to do' list.  However, since I listen to show tunes so much I wanted to have a place to discuss them and chronicle my adventures in cast albums.  

Big Project #1.  I'm going back in time.  I'm starting around the turn of the century and listen to every recording available working my way forward in time.  I should reach the present day when I turn 100.  No matter.  The purpose of this?  None.  Just curious.  I'm also crazy about starting at the beginning of things.  When I was a kid I collected G.I. Joe Comic books.  I had so many, but I didn't read a single one because I never had #1, and a wouldn't read them out of order.  Crazy?  yes.  That is sort of the reason I want to start at the beginning with the show tunes.  

In addition to Big Project #1.  I'll write about other shows I listen to or see.  Who knows.  I don't expect anyone but the most dedicated musical theater nerds to pay any attention to this.  

Let the listening begin!!